|
Perpetual Free Energy System
Firstly a note: I
am making my approach to you
all via this rather informal medium mainly for expediency sake,
but being a conservationist at heart, also because it will
serve the desired purpose without adding to the already far too enormous
waste of paper by sending hard copies all over the world. However I
would very much appreciate your close consideration of the content
just the same, as it is tendered in the spirit of participation and
cooperation in the battle we all now face to address the potential
tragedy that Global Warming is destined to present us with in the
not too distant future if immediate action is not taken by everyone
who is in any way capable of taking it.
That said, allow
me now to explain as briefly as I can how I
am able (I believe) to contribute in no small way to the reduction of fuel generated
energy in any country that would be prepared to eventually adopt the
system and the strategy that I am about to describe, at least in
part.
Over the past several years I have been developing ideas
that I have had for some time on how energy can be produced in significant
enough amounts but without consuming any form of fuel, producing
nil pollution, nil negative environmental impact and at a cost
that becomes insignificant when compared with the nuclear approach.
A system to be of benefit, not only to individuals, but to entire
nations and I believe now that I have the basis of such a system
and one that can be scaled to suit almost any requirement: from
powering a flashlight; to running a hospital or mutli-story office
complex; to providing all of the energy needs for an entire city.
This system requires no fuel of any nature, no batteries, it is
not reliant on the wind or the sun or a flowing river or thermal heat,
yet it produces a perpetual supply of energy and at absolutely no
cost other than the initial capital expense and a little regular
maintenance.
The environment in which this system is to
be used will determine to a certain extent the specifications needed
to fulfill the varying requirements: for example in Perth
Australia where the temperature is neither too hot nor too cold at any
time, the energy needs would be quite different to say Paris or
London where the temperatures vary quite considerably from very high
to very low, depending on the season, or Bangkok where it is
generally very hot all the time, and as such the energy expenditure
varies accordingly. But for the present and to fulfill the purpose of
this introduction I am going to provide a simple example relating to
average conditions, and though there is an infinite range of
potential applications, I have chosen just one here that I think
provides a clear picture of what is possible and how hugely
beneficial it can be, not only to the war against global warming but
also to the general public in terms of reduced energy costs that can
be passed on to them if this system is adopted after it is
perfected.
'The Street Light'
Wherever there are
people there are street lights, and that has been the case
since centuries past, but today literally billions of them are ablaze
every night and guzzling enormous amounts of energy whilst adding significantly
to the adverse effects that our planet is suffering, and
for no other reason than to provide light to otherwise dark locations
(and of course to attract bugs).
Now I don't know for
sure yet (and I am hoping that those
who have been specifically contacted via e-mail will be able to assist me with
required data) but if we take an average size large city like London,
Sydney, Paris, New York for example, it would be safe to say that
there would be 'at least' one million street lights in each
(probably considerably more). Let's assume for the exercise that
each (suburban light) burns on average 200 watts of energy
(that's probably being very conservative too and doesn't take
into consideration highway and freeway lights, which would need a
lot more than a suburban light). That translates to 200 million
watts consumed for that purpose alone. However if each was replaced with
a unit that consumes none at all from the electricity utility grid, but instead adds
surplus energy that it doesn't need to it, then what we would see is
a major reduction in negative environmental impact and a very
significant boost to the available energy on the grid.
If one self sufficient
unit needs 200 watts during the night to power its light source,
but actually produces 300 watts, then it has 100 watts surplus that can
be channelled to the grid, or 100 million watts. However during
the daylight hours, and because it is operating perpetually but has no
drain when the lights are not on, it has 300 watts that can be
channelled to the grid, or 300 million watts. (more than sufficient - I
am assuming for the present - to run an entire city electric train
system). What we would have then is virtually one million mini power
stations providing Free Energy 24/7.
The unit I am referring
in this instance is circular - for convenience sake for now rather than
necessity - and is approximately 18" (or 46 cm) in diameter. It
would be equipped with the latest technology in high illumination,
low heat and low energy consumption fluro tubes and would be almost
maintenance free for many years. Imagine the reduction in
environmental damage if the many billions of street lights all over
the world consumed no fuel, produced no pollution or heat and lasted
ten to twenty times longer than those being used today.
But it
doesn't end there because houses, apartment blocks, office blocks,
factories and manufacturing plants, hospitals, schools and
universities and so on could all be energy self sufficient and have
surplus to provide to the state for cash or credits that would
eventually cover the capital expenditure of installation. This
system could also be used for buses, ships, trains, certain
appliances and even to provide the energy needs of entire suburbs;
It can be put beneath the ground if needs be and have recreation
facilities or parks, even buildings, situated on top. It's all
simply a matter of scale.
Compare this with other perpetual energy
systems, like wind
turbine farms that occupy huge tracts of land that then
can not be used for other purposes and are entirely reliant on the whims
of mother nature to provide the driving force, and hydro-power stations
that are at the mercy of the rains; The dangers, waste disposal
complications, public antipathy and enormous costs associated with
nuclear power plants makes them far from the perfect solution
also, and fossil fuel power stations need no further condemnation than
the effect they are having and have had for eons on the
global climate.
Water Purification
Imagine for a moment a water purification
plant that could function 24 hours of the day at no energy related cost. Many
nations are presently in the midst of severe water shortages and have no way
to overcome that gargantuan problem, other than perhaps to recycle their sewerage,
but many of them, like Australia for example, are surrounded or at least partly bordered
by oceans with an unlimited supply if only it could be rendered suitable for human
consumption and use at a reasonable cost. The very air that surrounds most parts of most
of these nations is also laden with water that could be extracted if only there
was a cost effective method of doing so. But if there was a way to energise such
a fresh water production facility without the enormous fuel costs that would normally
be involved, then a lot of the prevailing water shortage problems would be solved.
If pipelines can be built across continents to move oil
then they can also be built to move life giving water, but of course water isn't valued by
the barrel and as such gets scant attention when it comes to thinking of long pipelines.
However if it was possible to get sufficient water to arid interior regions where crops,
livestock and farming in general can't normally exist, and at a cost that would be limited
to the capital expenditure and maintenance only, and which expense could be recouped over
time by a tariff on consumption, then the pipeline potential becomes feasible and vast
areas of unused and otherwise worthless land could be opened up and developed.
Bugs
Returning for a moment to the 'street light': Bugs - or insects if you like - are a
major problem, not only to suburbanites, but also for farmers and huge amounts of money are expended constantly to overcome the effects of
their relentless proliferation. But a simple solution for suburbanites would be to have every street light serving an additional purpose to
those already mentioned: With a slightly adjusted design the above mentioned street lights could become not only a self sufficient light source
and a mini power station, but also a bug zapper whereby they would not only attract bugs, but also
suck them through a zapper and eliminate them.
However many farmers face a more
destructive consequence of bug infestations and are forced to resort to chemicals and pesticide solutions that
are not only harmful to the environment in general but also to the humans who consume their
produce. If however they had a unit that was stand alone, needed no batteries or fuel and provided an additional
8 to 10 hours of light for their crops to convert to growth, they would probably be able to squeeze in an
additional crop each year. But if that same light was to also attract the plagues of bugs that one way or
another take their toll on profits and then zapp them and return them to nourish the earth, then by year's
end the farmer would be well in front, his produce would be unpolluted by bug repellents and the savings
all round would eventually cover his capital expenditure.
Now all that said, and with the unshakable conviction that a
perpetual free energy system that could make all of the above - and much more - possible, is
feasible and not simply a 'pipe' dream, I hereby request your assistance. To move forward on the development of specifications
and working prototypes I need, and would very much appreciate, your assistance in establishing the criteria related
to various locations, and request that you provide the following
information specific to your area.
1. The
energy requirement in watts of:
(a) the average suburban street
light.
(b) the average freeway or highway
light.
2. The
average number of both types of street lights per 1 million 'city'
population.
3. The
average (a) [high] summer (b) [low] winter temperature for your
country.
4. The
average energy consumption in watts for (a) summer and (b) winter
for:
(a) the average large hospital.
(b) the average large
university.
(c) the average large multi story office block
(specify average number of floor levels and number of
offices).
(d) the average large factory or manufacturing
plant.
(e) the average 3 to 4 bedroom house.
(f) the average large
multi level apartment block (specify average number of levels and
number of apartments)
(g) the average large hotel. (specify the
average number of levels and accommodation
units)
5. The
average number of petroleum powered public transport busses per 1
million city
population.
6. The
average number of diesel powered trains per 1 million city
population. (specify the average number of carriages per
train)
7. The
average energy consumption in watts of electric commuter trains per
1 million
population.
8.
Provide details of your government's policy regards the purchase of
surplus energy that may be able to be channelled to the state grid by
non-governmental
entities.
9. Provide
details
of your government's attitude towards (a) providing assistance
where possible (b) low interest funding for the establishment
of small power plant facilities (suitable for say the average
suburb) (c) venture capital security
guarantees.
For security reasons I ask that, for the present
at least, you communicate with me via the following e-mail address. Later,
once a certain level of progress has been made, all communications
will be channelled though a globally represented law office that I
have appointed to the task of keeping a tight grip on all security
matters.
On
closing allow me to add that I would not be at all shocked if you
were to consider that I have lost a few marbles. And I agree that
the ramifications of what I have detailed here are enormous and seem
just too fanciful, but be assured that I am not delusional and fully appreciate
the potential magnitude of this endeavour. I'm sure though that you
understand that the world would not be where it is today without the
inventions of your average Joe (just like me). Take the sewing machine
as a classic example: A humble tailor changed the world when he
decided to make life a little easier for himself by inventing a
machine that would do a lot of the work for him. However when his
peers realised what he had done they became very afraid and smashed
the machine to pieces because they believed it would throw them all
out of employment. The inventor was not dissuaded however and
eventually when the sewing machine was adopted more employment as well as
less expensive garments was the result. That tailor started
something with his simple idea that changed the world, and of course he is
but one of so many who have helped mankind develop in previously
unimaginable ways.
I'm not a humble tailor, I'm a humble architect (among other things)
and am 60 years young with no illusions regards where in
the universe I am placed, but my idea is as solid and sensible
as the sewing machine tailor's was, and I firmly believe that with a
little help I will be able to develop it to a stage where it is of
real benefit to the global population and in fact the planet
itself.
I look forward to your
initial contact if you have an interest.. : 
Venture Capital and Collaberation enquiries welcome. |
bravenet.com